There is no better way to become a well-rounded individual than by learning to play an instrument, draw, paint, write, or sing. These creative processes not only have a profound positive impact on the human brain but also teach invaluable discipline.
No machine can take away the unique essence of an artist or author.
I completely agree with Virginie Berger, who recently stated in a LinkedIn article that the music industry must “…invest in education and public awareness. Not lectures about infringement, but campaigns that remind people why human creativity matters.”
The artistic community needs to advocate for music education in our schools and highlight the long-term benefits of fostering creativity.
To be clear, I am not anti-AI—I use it to support my workflow.
However, there’s a big difference between simply pushing a button and calling yourself a songwriter based on the output, versus dedicating time and energy to crafting a song, musical composition, or novel. The way the human brain learns and captures creative data is nothing short of magical.
Organizations—whether for-profit or nonprofit—that use AI-generated music to promote their goods and services should be required to include a clear label on their advertisements stating that the music was AI-generated. Any resistance to such transparency suggests an awareness of the broader implications.
Looking ahead, if this trend of fewer people learning instruments continues, I wonder what the long-term impact will be on disciplines like math and science, which often benefit from the cognitive skills developed through music education.